Terrorists vs disgruntled employees
Jul. 22nd, 2005 09:22 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
spamsinkRemember several stories a few years ago when a disgruntled employee came to his (former) office and shot several of his (former) co-workers or arbitrary employees of the company (before killing himself)?
Suppose this way of dealing with frustration became fashionable and a loosely-knit "organization" calling itself "ALliance of Killers: Annoyed Employees who are Disgruntled Absolutely" had been formed, employing every possible means of communication, so that every time a disgruntled employee commits an act of mass murder-suicide, the organization claims responsibility. No one feels secure anymore even at their office workplaces; there is no way to identify an ALK:AEDA member. What is the society to do to prevent panic?
And how would that situation be different from the current one?
Suppose this way of dealing with frustration became fashionable and a loosely-knit "organization" calling itself "ALliance of Killers: Annoyed Employees who are Disgruntled Absolutely" had been formed, employing every possible means of communication, so that every time a disgruntled employee commits an act of mass murder-suicide, the organization claims responsibility. No one feels secure anymore even at their office workplaces; there is no way to identify an ALK:AEDA member. What is the society to do to prevent panic?
And how would that situation be different from the current one?
