Мне сам королевский жалко. Теперь, видать, его играть совсем перестанут - вместе с дебютом Берда (хотя то, что Берд кривой дебют - и без всякого компьютера ясно :-))
Мда. Ну в общем всё к тому идет. Насчет конкретно королевского гамбита — "хороший ход" Се2 кажется весьма странным, даже противоестественным для этого начала, т.е. действительно surprisingly.
Как-то все эти confidence calculations сомнительно выглядят (не говоря уж о том, что не видно никакого упоминания про доказательство корректности софта). "Solved" -- это некоторое преувеличение. To quote:
"So this means that the result is not 100% certain, it is just a hypothesis.
That is technically correct, similar to the assertion that a position where one side is more than two pieces down, without any compensation, is considered lost, even if you cannot calculate it to a forced mate against any defence. Sure, there theoretically might be a way to save the game, but if Rybka is displaying +5.12 or more the outcome is 99.99999999% secure. That is approximately the confidence number we give to our King's Gambit results: 99.99999999%. It might be that there is a flaw somewhere, but if there is it will not be discovered in the course of this universe – that would require more computational power than could ever be provided. And of course it is possible, and in fact very, very likely, that there is no flaw."
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
winterfish
no subject
Date: 2012-04-03 02:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-04-03 02:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-04-03 02:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-04-03 05:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-04-03 05:51 am (UTC)мышейшахмат Фишера дойдут...no subject
Date: 2012-04-03 06:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-04-03 09:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-04-03 02:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-04-03 09:42 pm (UTC)"So this means that the result is not 100% certain, it is just a hypothesis.
That is technically correct, similar to the assertion that a position where one side is more than two pieces down, without any compensation, is considered lost, even if you cannot calculate it to a forced mate against any defence. Sure, there theoretically might be a way to save the game, but if Rybka is displaying +5.12 or more the outcome is 99.99999999% secure. That is approximately the confidence number we give to our King's Gambit results: 99.99999999%. It might be that there is a flaw somewhere, but if there is it will not be discovered in the course of this universe – that would require more computational power than could ever be provided. And of course it is possible, and in fact very, very likely, that there is no flaw."
no subject
Date: 2012-04-03 10:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-04-03 11:17 pm (UTC)http://www.chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp?newsid=8051
no subject
Date: 2012-04-03 11:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-04-04 02:13 pm (UTC)спасибо!